Privacy and Artificial Intelligence - 2.2 Data Minimization and Robust Access Controls

2.2 Data Minimization and Robust Access Controls

Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now a part of everyday life, from smart devices and online services to healthcare and education. With so much information being collected and processed, it is crucial to make sure only the right data is gathered and that only the right people can access it. Data minimization means collecting only the information that is absolutely necessary for a specific purpose, helping to make sure only the right data is gathered. For example, if a smart home assistant only needs to know your preferred music genre to make recommendations, it should not collect your full contact list or location data. This approach reduces privacy risks and limits the amount of sensitive information that could be exposed in case of a data breach (ICO, 2024; Kiteworks, 2025). Robust access controls are rules and technologies that make sure only authorized people can access sensitive information. Together, these practices help protect privacy, reduce the risk of data breaches, and build trust in AI systems.

Technical or Conceptual Background

Data minimization is a core principle in many privacy laws, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and similar regulations in other countries (ICO, 2024; Kiteworks, 2025). The idea is simple: organizations should only collect, store, and use the smallest amount of personal data needed to achieve their goals. This helps protect people’s privacy and reduces the risk of data breaches, because there is less information that could be stolen or misused.

Access controls are the technical and organizational measures that ensure only authorized people can access certain data. There are many types of access controls, such as passwords, biometric scans, and permission systems. The “principle of least privilege” is a key concept here: each person should only have the access they need to do their job—no more, no less (Keepnet Labs, 2025; Prove Privacy, 2025). For example, a teacher might be able to see all students’ grades, but a student should only be able to see their own. Another important method is multi-factor authentication, which requires more than one way to prove who you are before you can access sensitive information, such as a password and a code sent to your phone.

Together, data minimization and robust access controls help make AI systems safer and more trustworthy. They are especially important in areas where personal information is involved, such as healthcare, education, and financial services (PCPD, 2025; ICO, 2024).

Problems Being Solved or Best Practice Being Applied

Data minimization and robust access controls directly address several problems identified in Part 1, especially excessive data collection (Part 1.1) and unauthorized access (Part 1.2). By collecting only the information that is truly needed and making sure that only the right people can access it, organizations can reduce the risk of privacy violations and data breaches.

For example, if a company collects too much information about its users, it increases the chance that this information could be stolen or misused. If access controls are weak, even a small mistake—like sharing a password—could let a hacker see private information. By following the best practices of data minimization and robust access controls, organizations can prevent these problems and protect their users’ privacy (PCPD, 2025; ICO, 2024).

Role of Government and Regulatory Authorities

Governments and regulatory authorities play a central role in making sure that organizations follow data minimization and robust access control practices. They create laws and regulations that require organizations to collect only the information they need and to protect it with strong access controls. For example, the GDPR in Europe says that organizations must limit the collection of personal data to what is necessary for specific purposes and must take steps to prevent unauthorized access (European Parliament, 2016; ICO, 2024). In Hong Kong, the Privacy Commissioner’s Office (PCPD) provides guidelines and advice to help organizations understand how to implement these practices in their AI systems (PCPD, 2025).

Regulatory authorities also monitor organizations to make sure they are following the rules. They can conduct audits, investigate complaints, and issue fines or other penalties if organizations do not comply. For example, if a company is found to be collecting too much information or not protecting it properly, the regulator might require them to change their practices or pay a fine.

In addition to enforcing the rules, governments and regulatory authorities provide guidance and resources to help organizations understand and implement best practices. They publish checklists, toolkits, and case studies to show how data minimization and robust access controls can be applied in real-world situations. They also work with other countries to develop international standards and promote good practices around the world (OECD, 2023; ICO, 2024).

Governments also help raise awareness about privacy and security by running public campaigns, hosting workshops, and providing educational materials. For example, they might create videos or websites to explain safe technology use and the importance of protecting personal information. By doing all these things, governments and regulatory authorities help create a safer and more trustworthy environment for everyone who uses AI systems.

Role of Organizations and Businesses

Organizations and businesses are responsible for putting data minimization and robust access controls into practice in their AI systems. This means they need to develop policies and procedures that ensure only the necessary information is collected and that it is protected with strong access controls.

One important step is to conduct privacy impact assessments before implementing new AI systems. This means thinking carefully about what information will be collected, why it is needed, and how it will be protected (PCPD, 2025; ICO, 2024). For example, before launching a new classroom app, a school might review what data the app will collect and make sure it is only what is needed for learning.

Organizations also need to implement technical controls, such as encryption, anonymization, and secure authentication methods. Encryption means scrambling information so that only people with the right key can read it. Anonymization means removing or changing information so that it cannot be linked back to a specific person. Secure authentication methods, like multi-factor authentication, help make sure that only the right people can access sensitive information (Keepnet Labs, 2025; Prove Privacy, 2025).

Training and awareness are also important. Organizations should train their employees on data minimization and access control best practices, so everyone understands how to protect personal information. For example, staff should know how to create strong passwords, recognize phishing emails, and report suspicious activity.

Organizations should also monitor and audit their systems regularly to make sure that data minimization and access control practices are being followed. This includes reviewing access logs, checking who has access to what information, and removing unnecessary permissions (Keepnet Labs, 2025; DP Network, 2025). For example, if an employee changes roles or leaves the organization, their access rights should be updated or removed.

Finally, organizations should be transparent with their users about how their information is collected, used, and protected. They should provide clear privacy notices and give users ways to exercise their rights, such as requesting access to their data or asking for it to be deleted (European Parliament, 2016; ICO, 2024).

Role of Vendors and Third Parties

Vendors and third parties play a critical role in data minimization and robust access controls, especially when they provide software, cloud services, or other technology that organizations use to build and run their AI systems.

Vendors need to ensure that their products and services support data minimization by allowing organizations to collect only the information they need. For example, a vendor might provide tools that let organizations set limits on what data is collected or how long it is stored (Kiteworks, 2025). Vendors should also offer features that help organizations anonymize or pseudonymize data, so that personal information is protected even if it is processed by AI.

Access control is also important for vendors. They should provide strong authentication methods, such as multi-factor authentication, and support role-based and attribute-based access controls (Keepnet Labs, 2025; Imprivata, 2025). This means that organizations can set rules about who can access what information, based on their job or other attributes. Vendors should also offer monitoring and auditing tools, so organizations can track who has accessed sensitive data and detect any unusual activity.

Vendors must also be transparent about their own data handling practices. They should provide clear documentation about what data they collect, how it is used, and how it is protected. They should also have processes in place to respond to security incidents and notify customers if their data is affected (Cloud Security Alliance, 2023; Imprivata, 2025).

Finally, vendors should support compliance with relevant laws and regulations, such as GDPR or local privacy laws. This includes providing features that help organizations meet their legal obligations and offering guidance on best practices for data minimization and access control (Kiteworks, 2025; Imprivata, 2025).

Role of Employees and Internal Teams

Employees and internal teams are essential for making data minimization and robust access controls work in practice. They are the ones who collect, process, and protect personal information every day.

Developers and IT staff need to build AI systems that support data minimization and strong access controls. This means writing code that only collects the information that is needed and designing systems that check who is trying to access sensitive data (Keepnet Labs, 2025; Prove Privacy, 2025). For example, developers might use special tools to anonymize data or implement multi-factor authentication.

Other employees, such as teachers, administrators, or customer service staff, need to follow the organization’s policies and procedures for handling personal information. They should only collect the information that is necessary for their work and make sure that it is protected with strong access controls. For example, a teacher should not share students’ grades with anyone who is not authorized to see them.

Employees should also be trained on privacy and security best practices. This includes understanding how to create strong passwords, recognize phishing emails, and report suspicious activity (Keepnet Labs, 2025; DP Network, 2025). Regular training helps ensure that everyone knows how to protect personal information and what to do if something goes wrong.

Internal teams, such as privacy officers or security teams, play a key role in monitoring and auditing the organization’s practices. They review access logs, check who has access to what information, and make sure that unnecessary permissions are removed. They also investigate and respond to security incidents, such as data breaches or unauthorized access attempts (ISO/IEC 27001, 2022; DP Network, 2025).

By working together, employees and internal teams help create a culture of privacy and security that protects everyone’s information.

Role of Industry Groups and Professional Bodies

Industry groups and professional bodies help shape the standards and best practices for data minimization and robust access controls in AI systems. They bring together experts from different organizations to share knowledge, develop guidelines, and promote good practices.

For example, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) publish standards and frameworks for information security and privacy (ISO/IEC 27001, 2022; NIST, 2023). These standards provide detailed guidance on how to implement data minimization and access controls in practice.

Professional bodies, such as the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), offer training and certification programs for privacy and security professionals (IAPP, 2024). These programs help people learn about the latest best practices and how to apply them in their organizations.

Industry groups also advocate for strong privacy and security laws and regulations. They work with governments and regulators to make sure that new rules are practical and effective. They also provide resources and support to help organizations comply with these rules (OECD, 2023; IAPP, 2024).

By setting standards, providing training, and advocating for good practices, industry groups and professional bodies help organizations protect personal information and build trust with their users.

Role of International and Multilateral Organizations

International and multilateral organizations play a key role in promoting data minimization and robust access controls around the world. They develop global standards, provide technical assistance, and facilitate cooperation between countries.

For example, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has developed privacy guidelines that emphasize data minimization and strong access controls (OECD, 2023). These guidelines influence policy and practice in many countries, helping to create a more consistent global approach to privacy and security.

The United Nations (UN) and other international bodies also work on AI governance and cybersecurity, promoting human rights-based approaches to data protection (UNESCO, 2021). They provide platforms for countries to share knowledge, learn from each other, and develop joint solutions to common challenges.

International organizations also support capacity building in developing countries, helping them implement strong privacy and security measures. This includes providing training, technical assistance, and resources to help organizations comply with international standards (OECD, 2023; UNESCO, 2021).

By fostering global cooperation and setting high standards, international and multilateral organizations help protect personal information and promote trust in AI systems worldwide.

Role of Consumers and Users

Consumers and users have an important role in driving the adoption of data minimization and robust access controls. Their choices and feedback can influence how organizations design and operate their AI systems.

Informed consumers can demand products and services that respect their privacy and protect their information. For example, users may prefer apps that only ask for the information they need and that have strong security features, such as multi-factor authentication (ICO, 2024; Kiteworks, 2025).

Users can also exercise their rights under privacy laws, such as requesting access to their data, correcting inaccuracies, or asking for their information to be deleted (European Parliament, 2016; ICO, 2024). These rights empower individuals to take control of their personal information and hold organizations accountable.

Feedback mechanisms, such as user surveys, complaint channels, and public forums, provide valuable insights into user concerns and experiences. Organizations can use this input to improve their practices and address privacy risks (ENISA, 2021; ICO, 2024).

Educational initiatives aimed at consumers help raise awareness about privacy risks and best practices for safe technology use. This includes understanding the implications of data sharing, recognizing phishing or social engineering attacks, and using privacy-enhancing tools (IAPP, 2024).

Ultimately, empowered consumers contribute to a market environment where privacy and security are competitive advantages, motivating continuous improvement in AI system design.

Role of Members of the Public

Members of the public influence data minimization and robust access controls through advocacy, education, and participation in policymaking. Public opinion and activism can influence lawmakers and organizations to prioritize privacy and security in AI systems.

Civil society organizations and advocacy groups raise awareness about privacy risks and push for stronger regulations and ethical AI practices (EFF, 2023). For example, groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation campaign for digital rights and transparency in AI development.

Public consultations and participatory policymaking processes allow citizens to voice their concerns and contribute to the creation of balanced and effective privacy laws. This engagement helps ensure that regulations reflect societal values and protect vulnerable populations (OECD, 2023; ICO, 2024).

Educational programs and media coverage inform the public about the importance of data minimization and access controls, empowering individuals to make informed choices and demand accountability (IAPP, 2024). For example, news stories about data breaches can help people understand why privacy matters.

By fostering a culture of privacy and security, members of the public help create an environment where organizations are motivated to adopt best practices and where AI technologies are developed responsibly.

Role of Artificial Intelligence Itself

AI itself can support data minimization and robust access controls by automating privacy and security functions, reducing human error and increasing efficiency.

For instance, AI can be used to detect anomalies in data access patterns, flagging potential breaches or unauthorized activities in real time. Machine learning models can identify suspicious behavior faster than traditional methods, enabling quicker incident response (Veale, 2022).

AI can also assist in data anonymization and pseudonymization, transforming personal data to protect identities while preserving utility for analysis. Techniques like differential privacy can be integrated into AI systems to provide mathematical guarantees of privacy (Dwork & Roth, 2014). For example, a research project might use AI to study learning patterns, but only use information that cannot be traced back to any one person.

Moreover, AI can help automate compliance monitoring by continuously checking whether data processing activities align with regulatory requirements and internal policies. This includes generating audit trails and producing reports for regulators (Veale, 2022).

However, AI systems must be carefully designed to avoid introducing new risks, such as bias or over-reliance on automated decisions. Human oversight remains essential to ensure that AI supports privacy and security goals effectively and ethically (Veale, 2022).

Role of Bad Actors

Bad actors, including hackers, cybercriminals, and malicious insiders, pose significant challenges to the implementation of data minimization and robust access controls in AI systems. Their activities aim to exploit vulnerabilities, steal sensitive data, or disrupt AI operations for financial gain, political motives, or other malicious purposes.

Cyberattacks such as data breaches, ransomware, and supply chain attacks can compromise AI systems and the personal information they process. For example, adversaries may target AI training data to introduce bias or manipulate outcomes, a tactic known as data poisoning (Biggio & Roli, 2018). If a bad person changes how an AI learns, it might start making wrong decisions or treating people unfairly.

Insider threats, where employees or contractors misuse access privileges, can also undermine privacy and security efforts. These individuals may exfiltrate data or sabotage AI models, causing significant harm (Greitzer & Frincke, 2010).

Bad actors continuously evolve their techniques, leveraging AI themselves to automate attacks, evade detection, and exploit new vulnerabilities. This arms race necessitates robust, adaptive security measures embedded in AI systems from the design phase (ISACA, 2025; Symantec, 2024).

Understanding the tactics, techniques, and procedures of bad actors helps organizations anticipate threats and develop effective countermeasures. Collaboration between industry, government, and academia is essential to share threat intelligence and improve resilience against malicious activities (ISACA, 2025).

Glossary

Term	Meaning and Example Sentence
Data Minimization	Collecting only the information that is needed. Example: “Data minimization meant the app didn’t ask for your address.”
Access Controls	Rules and technology that make sure only the right people can access information. Example: “Access controls let the teacher see your grades, but not other students.”
Principle of Least Privilege	Giving each person only the access they need to do their job. Example: “The principle of least privilege means the custodian can open the door but not see your records.”
Multi-Factor Authentication	Using more than one way to prove who you are before you can access something. Example: “Multi-factor authentication means you need a password and a code from your phone to log in.”
Anonymization	Changing information so it cannot be linked back to a specific person. Example: “Anonymization made the survey answers safe to use, because no one could tell who wrote them.”

Questions

1. What is data minimization, and why is it important for AI systems?

2. How do robust access controls help protect personal information in AI systems?

3. What is the principle of least privilege, and how does it relate to access controls?

4. How can employees and internal teams support data minimization and robust access controls?

5. What role do bad actors play in challenging data minimization and access controls?

Answer Key

1. Suggested Answer: Data minimization means collecting only the information that is needed for a specific purpose, which helps protect privacy and reduce the risk of data breaches in AI systems (ICO, 2024; PCPD, 2025).

2. Suggested Answer: Robust access controls ensure that only authorized people can access sensitive information, preventing unauthorized use or disclosure in AI systems (Keepnet Labs, 2025; Prove Privacy, 2025).

3. Suggested Answer: The principle of least privilege means giving each person only the access they need to do their job, which helps keep information safe by limiting who can see or use it (Keepnet Labs, 2025; DP Network, 2025).

4. Suggested Answer: Employees and internal teams support data minimization and robust access controls by following organizational policies, using strong authentication methods, and reporting suspicious activity (Keepnet Labs, 2025; DP Network, 2025).

5. Suggested Answer: Bad actors try to exploit weaknesses in data minimization and access controls to steal or misuse personal information, making it important for organizations to use strong security measures (Biggio & Roli, 2018; Symantec, 2024).

References

Biggio, B., & Roli, F. (2018). Wild patterns: Ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning. Pattern Recognition, 84, 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.07.023
Cloud Security Alliance. (2023). Security guidance for critical areas of focus in cloud computing. https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/research/security-guidance/
DP Network. (2025). Access controls: Protecting your systems and data. https://dpnetwork.org.uk/data-security-access-controls/
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211–407. https://doi.org/10.1561/0400000042
ENISA. (2021). Privacy and security by design in AI systems. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/privacy-and-security-by-design-in-ai-systems
European Parliament. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
Greitzer, F. L., & Frincke, D. A. (2010). Combining traditional cyber security audit data with psychosocial data: Towards predictive modeling for insider threat mitigation. In Proceedings of the 2010 New Security Paradigms Workshop, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900546.1900548
IAPP. (2024). Data minimization and privacy-preserving techniques in AI systems. International Association of Privacy Professionals. https://iapp.org/resources/article/data-minimisation-and-privacy-preserving-techniques-in-ai-systems
ICO. (2024). Data minimization and privacy-preserving techniques in AI systems. Information Commissioner’s Office. https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/ico-and-stakeholder-consultations/ico-call-for-input-artificial-intelligence
Imprivata. (2025). Vendor access control. https://www.imprivata.com/knowledge-hub/vendor-access-control
ISACA. (2025). Six steps for third-party AI risk management. ISACA Now Blog. https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2025/six-steps-for-third-party-ai-risk-management
ISO/IEC 27001. (2022). Information security management systems. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/27001
Keepnet Labs. (2025). Access control explained – 2025 cybersecurity guide & models. https://keepnetlabs.com/blog/what-is-access-control-a-cybersecurity-guide-for-2025
Kiteworks. (2025). What is data minimization and why is it important? https://www.kiteworks.com/risk-compliance-glossary/data-minimization/
NIST. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
OECD. (2023). OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. https://www.oecd.org/digital/privacy/
PCPD. (2025). The Privacy Commissioner’s Office has completed compliance checks on AI systems. https://www.pcpd.org.hk/english/news_events/media_statements/press_20250508.html
Prove Privacy. (2025). Understanding access controls in relation to data protection compliance. https://www.proveprivacy.com/understanding-access-controls-in-relation-to-data-protection-compliance/
Symantec. (2024). Threat intelligence and cybersecurity trends. https://www.symantec.com/security-center
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455
Veale, M. (2022). AI and privacy: The role of automation in compliance. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 35(1), 1–73. https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/assets/articlePDFs/v35/35HarvJLTech1.pdf